Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with unitary-fusion-category
Search options not deleted
user 490128
Questions about fusion categories or tensor categories with a unitary (Hilbert space and dagger) structure on the morphisms, and dagger-preserving functors.
1
vote
Non-negative integer matrix representation of a fusion ring
I think I found a counterexample if the characteristic of $M$ is nonzero:
Let $B$ be the matrices corresponding to the permutations of the alternating group of $3$ elements, denoted as $\{ 1,x,x^* \} …
- 1,245