Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
Questions taking place in the category of locales, which is given by the opposite of the category of frames. Also appropriate for questions about pointless topology.
5
votes
1
answer
197
views
Topological regularity for toposes
Often, topological properties of locales can be generalized naturally to toposes (or, often, to geometric morphisms). … Is there a notion of "regularity" for toposes that generalizes the topological notion of regularity for spaces and locales? …
8
votes
1
answer
209
views
Detecting positive endomaps of the formal reals
Locales are often better-behaved than topological spaces in constructive mathematics (i.e. in the absence of the law of excluded middle). … My question is: suppose $f:R_f \to R_f$ is a continuous map of locales, such that $f(x)>0$ for all points $x$ of $R_f$ (i.e. for all actual real numbers $x$); does it follow (constructively) that $f$ factors …
15
votes
1
answer
1k
views
The real numbers object in Sh(Top)
If $X$ is a sober topological space, the real numbers object in the topos $\mathrm{Sh}(X)$ is the sheaf of continuous real-valued functions on $X$. This is proven very explicitly in Theorem VI.8.2 of …
16
votes
1
answer
566
views
Do strict pro-sets embed in locales?
Can "strict pro-sets" be identified with "pro-discrete locales"?
Note that some hypothesis such as "surjective transition maps" is necessary. … For instance, the pro-set $\cdots \xrightarrow{+1} \mathbb{N} \xrightarrow{+1} \mathbb{N} \xrightarrow{+1} \mathbb{N}$ is not isomorphic to the trivial pro-set ∅, but its limit in the category of locales …