Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with lattice-theory
Search options not deleted
user 46003
The theory of lattices in the sense of order theory. For the number-theoretic notion, use the tag "lattices" instead.
2
votes
Proper coverings as a quotient of the coverings
I don't think they are isomorphic. Let $X=\mathbb N$ and let $A$ be a covering consisting of the sets of the form
$$ a_n = \{ 0, \dots, n \} $$
for every $n\in \mathbb N$.
Then, $A$ is not $\simeq$-e …
- 621