Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
Enriched categories, topoi, abelian categories, monoidal categories, homological algebra.
1
vote
Kleisli Monad bijection
I agree with Mike that you shouldn't NEED this, BUT the answer is yes. The monad $T$ arises as coming from the adjunction $U:C^T \to C:F$, where $C^T$ is its category of Eilenberg-Moore algebras. Sinc …
2
votes
Non-canonicity of skeleta
I believe that your theorem is false. Suppose that for every small category $C$ I make an arbitrary choice of representing object for each isomorphism class. Then, the fullsubcategory on these chosen …
5
votes
When is the $(F_!,F^*)$ counit a natural isomorphism?
In general, the counit of an adjunction is an isomorphism if and only if the right-adjoint is fully faithful (dually the unit is an iso iff the left-adjoint is fully-faithful). So, your question is ea …
1
vote
A 2-categorical generalization of "final diagram" (I asked for)
Lax-pseudo limits, bilimits, or weak-2-limits- choose your terminologoy- don't use non-invertible $2$-cells in their definitions or universal properties. (If you ask for genuine lax or oplax limits, i …
1
vote
Accepted
Extracting the Sheaf and espace étalé condition from an abstractly given equivalence between...
The general definition of sheaf, is much more general than a local homeomorphism over a space- however, it is sheaves of this later kind that came about first. In the general framework, you have a sma …
3
votes
Limits are terminal objects in another category; (when) are they colimits of (another diagram)?
Todd already gave a beautiful answer. However, I will try to give a quick answer myself in simpler language:
Since $\eta:F \Rightarrow \Delta_H$ is a limiting cone, for each object $A$, the induced m …
1
vote
1
answer
150
views
Coproducts compute with finite limits in a reflective subcategoroy?
This question is related to this one: Which limits are preserved by a reflective left-adjoint?
(And in fact may be seen as a special case, but I think it merits its own question).
Suppose that $C$ i …
16
votes
Which functors between multicategories that come from monoidal categories are monoidal?
See Leinster's "Higher Operads, Higher Categories" Example 2.1.10. Maps of multicategories which come from monoidal categories are precisely the same as lax monoidal functors.
1
vote
2
answers
263
views
Name for a functor with this property?
Let $F:C \to D$ be a functor. Then, for all $c \in C_0$ we have an induced functor $F/c:C/c \to D/Fc$. Suppose that for each $c$, $F/c$ has a right adjoint. There's surely a name for such a functor. W …
5
votes
0
answers
133
views
On locally-reflective subcategories
I am interested in the following situation:
Suppose that $i:C \to D$ is a functor, $C$ does not necessarily have a terminal object, and for each object $c$ of $C,$ the induced functor
$$C/c \to D/i( …
6
votes
0
answers
392
views
Characterizing the image of a faithful left adjoint.
If there is an adjunction between a category $C$ and $D$ such that the left adjoint $$L:C \to D$$ is faithful (but not full), can one describe the image of $L$ in terms of the co-unit of the adjunctio …
3
votes
0
answers
143
views
Which limits are preserved by a reflective left-adjoint?
This question is closely related to this one: Which limits are preserved by prolongation of presheaves?
Suppose that $r:C \hookrightarrow D$ is a full and faithful functor and $l:D \to C$ is a left-a …
4
votes
1
answer
775
views
Local presentability and representable presheaves over the category of topological spaces
Is the category of topological spaces locally presentable? n-lab claims that it is not locally FINITELY presentable, but how about for some larger cardinal? Here I really mean the 1-category of topolo …
11
votes
What's a reasonable category that is not locally small?
The category of Grothendieck topoi and (equivalence classes of) geometric morphisms. For example, if $A$ is the classifying topos for abelian groups, the geometric morphisms from $Set$ to $A$ are in b …
9
votes
Accepted
What is the correct notion of Morita Equivalence between topological groupoids
I'll attempt to answer some of your questions. First off, 1) and 3) are equivalent. This is because the bicategory of fractions in 3) is the Morita bicategory of topological groupoids, which is equiva …