Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options not deleted user 4528

Algebraic varieties, stacks, sheaves, schemes, moduli spaces, complex geometry, quantum cohomology.

3 votes

On the local structure of stacks

I am not an expert in the algebraic category, however, I know that 2) is an open problem in the differentiable category; it is not known if every smooth orbifold is a global quotient stack. It is true …
David Carchedi's user avatar
11 votes
Accepted

Stacks in the Zariski topology?

1.) It's possible to define stacks on ANY category equipped with a Grothendieck topology (such a category with a topology is called a site). In particular, this holds true for the Zariski site. Moreov …
David Carchedi's user avatar
9 votes

Etalé space construction for presheaves on a Grothendieck site

It depends on what you mean by an étalé "space". As long as $C$ has a small set of topological generators (i.e. as long as $Sh(C,J)$ isn't too large to be a topos), there always exists a certain versi …
David Carchedi's user avatar
14 votes

Stacks vs. Groupoids

I will try to answer this question in a way relevant to more than one field, however, to be honest, I'm rather unconventional in the sense that my experience in this area stems from topological and di …
David Carchedi's user avatar
3 votes
1 answer
672 views

When does the left-adjoint to a geometric morphism preserve epis?

Suppose I have a functor $f:(C,J)\to(D,K)$ between Grothendieck sites. Is there a condition on $f$ such that $f_!$ (the left adjoint to $f^*$) sends "$J$-epimorphisms", to $K$-epimorphisms, where by $ …
David Carchedi's user avatar
2 votes

Definition of étale (etc) for non-representable morphisms of algebraic stacks?

The way I have always used the word étale in reference to a possibly-not-representable morphism of Deligne-Mumford stacks $f:\mathscr{X} \to \mathscr{Y}$ is that for any étale morphism $X \to \mathscr …
David Carchedi's user avatar
3 votes

Passage from the moduli functor to the functor of points of the coarse moduli space

I could be wrong, but I am going to be brave and assume that coarse moduli spaces are defined in the analogous way as for topological stacks. If this turns out being incorrect, I will remove this answ …
David Carchedi's user avatar
0 votes

Does adding "co"refinements to a Grothendieck pretopology change the topos?

I think you get the same sheaves if and only if your topos of sheaves can be expressed as as sheaves on some singleton pretopology: If $V \stackrel{f}{\rightarrow} X$ has the property that there exis …
David Carchedi's user avatar
5 votes
Accepted

Does the concept of a basis for a topology on a category exist?

Let $S$ be your Grothendieck site. What you want is a subcategory $j:B \hookrightarrow S$ such that the Grothendieck topology of $S$ restricts to $B$ in the sense that every covering sieve of $b \in B …
David Carchedi's user avatar
6 votes

Exactly how is 'the diagonal is representable' used for algebraic stacks...

If $X_1 \rightrightarrows X_0$ is a groupoid and $\mathcal{X}$ is the associated stack, consider the atlas $p:X_0 \to \mathcal{X}$. If you form the weak $2$-pullback of $p \times p:X_0 \times X_0 \to …
David Carchedi's user avatar
3 votes
0 answers
347 views

Colimit of an etale diagram of schemes

It is known that the category of schemes is not cocomplete (e.g. see this question: Colimits of schemes). However, do diagrams of schemes for which every morphism is etale have colimits? More generall …
David Carchedi's user avatar
14 votes
2 answers
1k views

Are all manifolds affine?

There is a classical result which says that the assignment $$M \mapsto C^{\infty}\left(M\right)$$ is an embedding of the category of (paracompact Hausdorff) smooth manifolds into the opposite category …
David Carchedi's user avatar
13 votes

What are the benefits of viewing a sheaf from the "espace étalé" perspective?

$\newcommand\Top{\mathit{Top}}\DeclareMathOperator\Sh{Sh}$One advantage is that it gives you a geometric representation for slice topoi of sheaves over a space: Given a topos $E$, $E$ is equivalent to …
David Carchedi's user avatar
5 votes

Internal hom of sheaves

I believe I have the answer in the setting of sheaves of sets. Let us first do this for presheaves, $Set^{C^{op}}$. This category is Cartesian-closed. This can be seen by setting $Y^X(U):=Hom(X \time …
David Carchedi's user avatar
8 votes
0 answers
841 views

Which sites in classical/derived algebraic geometry are hypercomplete?

Local questions: 1) Given a commutative ring $A,$ is $Sh_\infty\left(Spec(A)\right)$ hypercomplete? 2) Given a commutative ring $A,$ is $Sh_\infty\left(Et\left(A\right)\right)$ hypercomplete, where …
David Carchedi's user avatar

15 30 50 per page