Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
Questions about generalizations of the Riemann Zeta function of arithmetic interest whose definition relies on meromorphic continuation of special kinds of Dirichlet series, such as Dirichlet L-functions, Artin L-functions, elements of the Selberg class, automorphic L-functions, Shimizu L-functions, p-adic L-functions, etc.
14
votes
1
answer
522
views
Bound for $GL(3)$ symmetric square
Let $\pi$ be an automorphic representation of $GL(3)$ over a number field. Let $a_n$ be the coefficients of $L(s, \pi, \mathrm{sym}^2)$. Do we know if
$$\sum_{n>0} \frac{|a_n|}{n^s}$$
and
$$\sum_{n>0} …
11
votes
0
answers
192
views
Explicit L-factor for supercuspidals
I am interested in L-functions for the quasi-split unitary group $U$ in three variables, following the construction by zeta integrals of Gelbart-Piatetski-Shapiro. My aim is to understand the consiste …
11
votes
2
answers
1k
views
Relation between Fourier coefficients and Satake parameters
Let $L(s)$ be an automorphic L-function (attached to a self contragredient automorphic representation on $GL(3)$), according to the following notations for $s$ of sufficiently large real part:
$$L(s) …
8
votes
1
answer
315
views
Average bounds on Rankin-Selberg coefficients for modular forms
Let $f$ be a cuspidal Hecke newform of weight $k$ and level $N$, and denote by $a_f(n)$ its $n$-th Fourier coefficient. The newform $f$ is normalized so that $a_f(1) = 1$. As a consequence of Rankin-S …
8
votes
2
answers
829
views
On the consistency of the definition of the conductor for automorphic forms
Let $\pi$ be an irreducible admissible representation of $\mathrm{GL}_2(F)$, where $F$ is local non-archimedean. The local conductor associated to $\pi$ can be defined in two usual manners:
By its ass …
6
votes
1
answer
212
views
What is the conductor of an automorphic representation for $\Gamma_0(q)$ in $GSp(4)$?
Let $\pi$ be a generic cuspidal automorphic representation on $GSp(4)$, with level $\Gamma_0(q)$ (the group of symplectic matrices with lower left block divisible by $q$), i.e.
$$\Gamma_0(q) = \left\{ …
5
votes
1
answer
681
views
Poles of $L$-functions associated to Maass forms
Let $\pi$ be an automorphic representation of $GL_2$ over a number field. What can I say concerning the order of the pole at $1$ of the $L$-function $L(s, \pi)$? Can we say more about $L(s, \mathrm{Sy …
3
votes
1
answer
264
views
Consistency of the notion of conductor of a representation
The notion of analytic conductor of a generic representation of $\mathrm{GL}(n)$ has been defined by Iwaniec and Sarnak, and since then is at the heart of many works in analytic number theory and used …
3
votes
0
answers
201
views
Expression of the root number for Maass forms
Take a holomorphic cusp newform, say $f \in S_k(N)^\mathrm{new}$, for a squarefree level $N$. It is an eigenvalue of the Atkin-Lehner operator, and this feature allows to express its root number as
$$ …
3
votes
2
answers
205
views
What is known about gaps between zeros of L-functions?
In many different settings, it is possible to determine statistics about spacings (pair correlation, small gaps, large gaps, champions, etc.), for instance
prime numbers
Laplacian eigenvalues on a l …