Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with differential-topology
Search options not deleted
user 43645
The study of differentiable manifolds and differentiable maps. One fundamental problem is that of classifying manifolds up to diffeomorphism. Differential topology is what Poincaré understood as topology or “analysis situs”.
2
votes
1
answer
491
views
Extending diffeomorphisms of some faces of the standard $n$- simplex to a diffeomorphism of ...
I would be grateful if you could help me with the following question:
Let $n\in \mathbb{N}$ and $k\in \{1, \ldots, n+1\}$. For every $i=1, ..., k$ let $f_i : \partial_i \Delta^n \rightarrow \partial_ …
- 466
1
vote
A relative version of Ehresmann's theorem
I think that one can prove the relative version of Ehresmann's lemma (and also versions for manifolds with corners, which is my interest) without any technology as follows:
Let us first recall the fo …
- 466