Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options not deleted user 43439

Model theory is the branch of mathematical logic which deals with the connection between a formal language and its interpretations, or models.

33 votes
2 answers
2k views

Quantifier complexity of the definition of continuity of functions

This was previously asked at MSE, but I was told to ask it on MO. Consider the structure $(\mathbb{R};+,-,*,0,1,<)$. We adjoin to it a unary function $f$ defined everywhere on the set of real numbers, …
user107952's user avatar
  • 2,013
7 votes
1 answer
450 views

Are no infinite subsets of the set of all propositional atoms definable in this structure, e...

I asked this on Math Stack Exchange, but apparently no one paid attention to it. So, I am asking it again, filling in the background necessary to understand it. Consider a countably infinite set $P$ o …
user107952's user avatar
  • 2,013
4 votes
1 answer
273 views

What is an axiomatization of the equality-free theory of antisymmetric relations?

An antisymmetric relation is defined as a binary relation $R$ on a set $S$ such that $(xRy \land yRx) \rightarrow x=y$, for all $x,y$ in $S$. Certainly, they can't be defined in first-order logic with …
user107952's user avatar
  • 2,013
11 votes
1 answer
419 views

Is there a finitely axiomatizable class of structures whose equality-free theory is not fini...

This was originally an MSE question, but I was told to ask it on MathOverflow. Does there exist a class $C$ of $L$-structures for a finite signature $L$, which is finitely axiomatizable in first-order …
user107952's user avatar
  • 2,013
0 votes
1 answer
125 views

An infinite Leibnizian structure in a finite language with precisely $n$ definable elements

This question was inspired by Joel David Hamkins's excellent question on Leibnizian structures with no definable elements. Let $n$ be a positive integer. Is there an infinite structure in a finite lan …
user107952's user avatar
  • 2,013
27 votes
6 answers
2k views

Is this theory the complete theory of the real ordered field?

We know that the real ordered field can be characterized up to isomorphism as a complete ordered field. However this is a second order characterization. That raises the following question. Consider th …
user107952's user avatar
  • 2,013
13 votes
0 answers
229 views

Is there a finite equational basis for the join of the commutative and associative equations?

I asked this on math stack exchange, but I was told to post it on mathoverflow. Consider the lattice of equational theories of a single binary operation $*$. The meet of the theory axiomatized by the …
user107952's user avatar
  • 2,013
10 votes
0 answers
411 views

Equational theory in the signature (+,*,0,1) of sedenions and beyond

Consider a Cayley-Dickson algebra $(X,+,∗,0,1)$, that is an algebra generated from the reals by the Cayley-Dickson construction. From complexes to quaternions, we lose commutativity of multiplication, …
user107952's user avatar
  • 2,013
8 votes
2 answers
582 views

Is the equational theory of groups axiomatized by the associative law?

Consider the class of groups in the signature {*}. Is the equational theory of that class axiomatized by the associative law? I asked this on math stack exchange but I didn't receive a satisfactory an …
user107952's user avatar
  • 2,013