Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with fukaya-category
Search options answers only
not deleted
user 43423
For questions about Fukaya categories (as introduced by Fukaya in 1993) and their structure; consider also related tags such as [floer-homology] or [lagrangian-submanifolds].
5
votes
Generating Fukaya category vs split-generating Fukaya category
Yes, generation is stronger than split-generation, because you don't need to split off summands after forming iterated mapping cones with degree shifts.
The simplest example I have in mind is when $M$ …
- 3,187
10
votes
What is Known about the $K$-Theory of Fukaya Categories?
Let's say $X$ is an exact symplectic manifold, and $\pi:X\rightarrow\mathbb{C}$ is a Lefschetz fibration whose critical values are $z_1,\cdot\cdot\cdot,z_k\in\mathbb{C}$. Let $\gamma_1,\cdot\cdot\cdot …
- 3,187