Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with steenrod-algebra
Search options not deleted
user 43054
12
votes
Accepted
Why is $\pi_{-*}F(H\mathbb{F}_p, H\mathbb{F}_p)$ the mod $p$ Steenrod algebra?
Recall that by representability of cohomology plus the Yoneda lemma, a cohomology operation $H^i→H^j$ is the same thing as a map
$$ K(\mathbb{F}_p,i)→K(\mathbb{F}_p,j)\,.$$
Moreover, the suspension is …
- 16.5k
18
votes
Steenrod operations in etale cohomology?
Your first map fits in an action of the Steenrod algebra.
In fact $H^*_{ét}(X;\mathbb{F}_2)$ is the homology of $C^*_{ét}(X;\mathbb{F}_2)=R\Gamma(X;\mathbb{F}_2)$, an element of the derived category …
- 16.5k