Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with infinity-topos-theory
Search options answers only
not deleted
user 43054
14
votes
A "universally non Hypercomplete" $\infty$-topos via Goodwillie calculus?
As discussed in the comments, I'm writing here the proof of the following fact:
Let $\mathscr{X}_∞$ be the ∞-topos of sheaves on $\mathrm{FinTop}^{op}$ under the atomic topology (the topology wher …
- 16.5k
4
votes
Accepted
When is an $\infty$-categorical localization left exact?
Unless I misunderstand the statement, this is precisely proposition 6.2.1.1 in Higher Topos Theory.
- 16.5k