Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with model-categories
Search options not deleted
user 42658
A model category is a category equipped with notions of weak equivalences, fibrations and cofibrations allowing to run arguments similar to those of classical homotopy theory.
5
votes
Derivators and fibred $\infty$-categories
I am no Denis-Charles but given the other paper you quoted let me think of a sketch, perhaps you will be able to make the right out of it.
Let $\mathcal E \to \mathcal C$ be a Quillen presheaf (model …
- 660
1
vote
Deriving the functor $ \int_{\Gamma} F(-,-)$
A long comment.
The way you state the question currently mixes the abstract notion of derived functor (has nothing to do with fibrant replacements), and the notion of a co/fibrant replacement. I am …
- 660
7
votes
Why do we need model categories?
Extensive answers have already been given in this thread. Just a few remarks here and there.
I think the question “why we need” assumes something about “we”, and in some extent, about “need”. There …
- 660