Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
This tag is used if a reference is needed in a paper or textbook on a specific result.
29
votes
3
answers
3k
views
Is there a probability theory developed in intuitionistic logic?
Since Boole it is known that probability theory is closely related to logic.
According to the axioms of Kolmogorov, probability theory is formulated with a (normalized)
probability measure $\mbox …
6
votes
1
answer
102
views
Condition for a functor to induce a cartesian closed functor between categories of presheaves
We denote the category of presheaves on a small category ${\cal C}$ (set-valued functor-category) by $$\widehat{\cal C}:=[{\cal C}^{op},{\bf Set}].$$
Such a category is cartesian closed, i.e. it ha …
6
votes
2
answers
472
views
Heyting algebras originating from directed graphs
The category RefGph of reflexive directed graphs is the functor
category $\hat{∆}_1=\mbox{Fun}(∆^◦_1,$Set), where $∆_1$ is
the simplex category truncated at level 1.
Hence the poset Sub(X) of subob …
2
votes
1
answer
254
views
Is the logic of directed graphs generated by a finite set of formulae?
We consider the logic of reflexive directed graphs, i.e. the set
${\bf L}_1$ of those propositional formulae $\varphi$ in the variables $p_i$, which are valid in exactly these graphs.
It is a proper …
3
votes
0
answers
198
views
Is the class of Heyting algebras originating from directed graphs a variety?
The category RefGph of reflexive directed graphs
is the functor category $\hat{∆}_1=\mbox{Fun}(∆^◦_1,$Set), where $∆_1$ is
the simplex category truncated at level 1.
Hence the poset Sub(X) of subob …