Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options questions only not deleted user 38532

This tag is used if a reference is needed in a paper or textbook on a specific result.

2 votes
1 answer
254 views

Is the logic of directed graphs generated by a finite set of formulae?

We consider the logic of reflexive directed graphs, i.e. the set ${\bf L}_1$ of those propositional formulae $\varphi$ in the variables $p_i$, which are valid in exactly these graphs. It is a proper …
Frank's user avatar
  • 567
6 votes
1 answer
102 views

Condition for a functor to induce a cartesian closed functor between categories of presheaves

We denote the category of presheaves on a small category ${\cal C}$ (set-valued functor-category) by $$\widehat{\cal C}:=[{\cal C}^{op},{\bf Set}].$$ Such a category is cartesian closed, i.e. it ha …
Frank's user avatar
  • 567
3 votes
0 answers
198 views

Is the class of Heyting algebras originating from directed graphs a variety?

The category RefGph of reflexive directed graphs is the functor category $\hat{∆}_1=\mbox{Fun}(∆^◦_1,$Set), where $∆_1$ is the simplex category truncated at level 1. Hence the poset Sub(X) of subob …
Frank's user avatar
  • 567
6 votes
2 answers
472 views

Heyting algebras originating from directed graphs

The category RefGph of reflexive directed graphs is the functor category $\hat{∆}_1=\mbox{Fun}(∆^◦_1,$Set), where $∆_1$ is the simplex category truncated at level 1. Hence the poset Sub(X) of subob …
Frank's user avatar
  • 567
29 votes
3 answers
3k views

Is there a probability theory developed in intuitionistic logic?

Since Boole it is known that probability theory is closely related to logic. According to the axioms of Kolmogorov, probability theory is formulated with a (normalized) probability measure $\mbox …
Frank's user avatar
  • 567