Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with type-theory
Search options not deleted
user 38527
8
votes
Accepted
Is $\prod_{X : \mathcal{U}} (X \to X) \cong 1$ consistent with type theory?
$\prod_{X : \mathcal{U}} (X \to X) \cong 1$ is consistent. It follows from parametricity and function extensionality. Usual parametric models also support function extensionality. The simplest one whi …
- 213
2
votes
Why in Martin-Löf type theory any natural number is assumed to be either $0$ or $S(a)$ for s...
First, we should pin down that we're talking about closed terms with natural number type, that is, terms without free variables. A free variable with type $\mathsf{N}$ is clearly not of the form $0$ o …
- 213