Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with big-picture
Search options not deleted
user 36687
Questions designed to get an overview of a specific subject or body of results or to understand the relations among similar definitions, techniques or concepts appearing in different sub-fields of mathematics. While such questions by their very nature sometimes cannot be made very narrow and focused, it can be helpful to keep in mind that the design of MathOverflow does not make it a good fit for questions that are too broad.
4
votes
what can be said about the choice of a prior in Bayesian statistics?
Short answer from someone who doesn't know much
about Bayesian statistics:
You should read about "reference priors". Have a look here:
http://arxiv.org/pdf/0904.0156
- 1,731
2
votes
Every mathematician has only a few tricks
Taylor expansion. Much of the classical theory of statistics (and some of its modern extensions) revolves around performing a second-order Taylor expansion of the likelihood.