Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with grothendieck-topology
Search options not deleted
user 36285
7
votes
1
answer
462
views
Needless axiom for Grothendieck topologies?
Hi,
The first axiom for a Grothendieck (pre)topology on a category $C$ says that for every object $X\in C$, the family consisting of just the identity $1_X : X\to X$ should be a covering family.
Why …
- 2,842
5
votes
0
answers
349
views
cech cohomology in topos
Hi,
The following result seems to be well known, but I can't come up with a proof.
Suppose that $C$ is a topos and that $F\to G$ is an effective epimorphism in $C$. If $P$ is
any abelian sheaf on $C …
- 2,842
25
votes
Accepted
Crystalline cohomology via the syntomic site
A sketch of the proof is as follows:
Consider the site $Y_{syn-cris}$ where the objects are the same as in $Y_{cris}$ but the
covering families are surjective syntomic families. Then there are maps o …
- 2,842
20
votes
1
answer
3k
views
Crystalline cohomology via the syntomic site
Hello,
Let $k$ be a field of characteristic $p > 0$, and let $Y$ be a $k$-scheme. Consider the
sites $Y_{syn}$ and $(Y/W_n)_{cris}$ (where $W_n$ are the Witt vectors of $k$ of length $n$), of $Y$ wit …
- 2,842