Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with heegaard-floer-homology
Search options questions only
not deleted
user 35353
For questions about Heegaard-Floer homology (as introduced by Ozsváth-Szabó in 2003) and its uses in 3- and 4-dimensional topology.
7
votes
1
answer
1k
views
Wanted: differential coming from higher genus surface in Heegaard Floer homology
I am interested in studying moduli of complex surfaces which arise in computing the differential on the Heegaard Floer homology chain complex. In particular, I am interested in the generic case, when …
- 18.7k
12
votes
1
answer
976
views
Why is Heegaard Floer Homology defined in terms of Sym$^g\Sigma_g$ instead of Pic$^g\Sigma_g$?
Recall the definition of Heegaard Floer homology: $\Sigma_g$ is a closed surface, and $\{\alpha_1,\ldots,\alpha_g\}$ and $\{\beta_1,\ldots,\beta_g\}$ are sets of attaching circles. Then Heegaard Floe …
- 18.7k