Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with homotopy-type-theory
Search options not deleted
user 347155
The homotopy interpretation of constructive dependent type theory, the univalence axiom, higher inductive types, internal languages of higher toposes, univalent foundations for mathematics, and implementations of such theories in proof assistants.
10
votes
1
answer
2k
views
Why are W-types called "W"?
Why are W-types called "W"?
Probably "W" means either "wellordered" or "wellfounded". (Martin-Löf uses the term "wellorder".) But these are notions associated to order theory, whereas W-types don't di …
- 111