Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with noncommutative-algebra
Search options not deleted
user 32389
Non-commutative rings and algebras, non-associative algebras. Can be used in combination with ra.rings-and-algebras
14
votes
How to make the Capelli's identity less mysterious?
This order of terms in the determinant is the most mysterious point for me. Is there any reason for it? What happens if one chooses some other ordering of terms: will the Capelli identity be modifi …
- 16.5k
10
votes
Accepted
nth term in the Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff formula
The Dynkin formula is somewhat cumbersome. Maybe a better choice is Goldberg's version http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.dmj/1077466673 In the commutator form Goldberg's result is reformulated in http:/ …
- 16.5k