Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with schubert-calculus
Search options not deleted
user 323204
5
votes
1
answer
498
views
Cohomology ring of grassmannian and Pieri rule
I am sorry if this question is not for mathoverflow. I asked the same question on stackexchange (https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/4203667/cohomology-ring-of-grassmannian-and-pieri-rule), but I …
CommunityBot
- 1
3
votes
Cohomology ring of grassmannian and Pieri rule
The equation $\tau_2^{2}-2\tau_{3}\tau_{1}-\tau_{4}$ (obtained by Pieri rule) is incorrect. It should be
$$\tau_2^{2}-2\tau_{3,1}-\tau_{4},$$
so there is no problem for such computations.
- 81