Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with geometric-constructions
Search options answers only
not deleted
user 3199
19
votes
Accepted
Is the hierarchy of relative geometric constructibility by straightedge and compass a dense ...
There are three answers. Throughout let $qcl(F)$ be the quadratic closure of a field $F$ inside $\mathbb{C}$.
Part 1: Yes there is a quadratically closed field strictly between $qcl(\mathbb{Q})$ and …
- 18.7k
6
votes
Is the hierarchy of relative geometric constructibility by straightedge and compass a dense ...
I've figured out how to do the finite graph case, in the negative. The ordering of quadratically closed fields is not dense in that case either. Throughout let $qcl(F)$ denote the quadratic closure …
- 18.7k