Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options not deleted user 318

For questions about simplicial sets, simplicial (co)algebras and simplicial objects in other categories; geometric realization, Dold-Kan correspondence, simplicial resolutions etc.

5 votes

Transfer map of simplicial sets

The statement is not true (in topological spaces or simplicial sets). The composition $f'' \cdot f'$ will only be multiplication by $d$ "up to higher Atiyah--Hirzebruch filtration". For an explicit …
Oscar Randal-Williams's user avatar
10 votes
0 answers
291 views

A certain semi-simplicial space

I would like to understand whether the following construction has been studied. Let me model the pointed sphere as $S^n = I^n / \partial I^n$, and let $\Omega^n (-) := map((I^n, \partial I^n), (-, *)) …
Oscar Randal-Williams's user avatar
4 votes
Accepted

Continuous maps to fat geometric realizations of simplicial spaces

My first remark concerns Segal's (4.1). The technical details are key. Segal begins by choosing a locally finite partition of unity $f_i$ subordinate to the cover $U_i$. The definition of this term on …
Oscar Randal-Williams's user avatar
7 votes

Connectivity after Geometric Realization?

If you know the map on k-simplices is (n-k)-connected, you can deduce the map on realisations is n-connected. I don't think you can do better in any sort of generality.
Oscar Randal-Williams's user avatar
6 votes
1 answer
1k views

Homotopy pullbacks of simplicial spaces, and Bousfield-Friedlander

Let $X_\bullet \longrightarrow Y_\bullet \longleftarrow Z_\bullet$ be a diagram of simplicial spaces (=bisimplicial sets, if you like). On p. 14-9 of these notes there is an example which shows that …
Oscar Randal-Williams's user avatar
13 votes
Accepted

simplicial spaces without degeneracies

In brief: For your first question, no. Let $X_\bullet$ be any semi-simplicial space and $Y_\bullet$ have a point in degree zero and be empty in every other degree. Then $\vert X_\bullet \times Y_\bul …
Oscar Randal-Williams's user avatar
16 votes
Accepted

Topological Grothendieck Construction

This is a standard irritation. The issue is that $Top$ is not a category internal to $Top$, because it doesn't have a space of objects (and I don't mean for set-theoretic reasons), so what do you mean …
Oscar Randal-Williams's user avatar