Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
4
votes
1
answer
583
views
Comparison for formal local cohomology
Let $(R, \mathfrak{m})$ be a local ring and $X = Spec(R)$. Let $Y = V(I)$ be a closed subscheme of $X$, defined by an ideal $I \subset R$, and let $P \in X$ (in fact, $P \in Y$) be the closed point. …
2
votes
1
answer
181
views
Does local cohomology commute with taking the degree-zero component?
Let $S = \oplus_{d \geq 0} S_d$ be a graded (Noetherian) ring, let $I \subset S$ be a homogeneous ideal, and let $f \in S$ be a homogeneous element. Denote by $S_{(f)}$ the subring of degree-$0$ elem …
2
votes
Accepted
Independence of embedding for higher sheaf cohomology of local cohomology on projective space
It is false! As mentioned in the edit, a positive answer to this question would imply the Lyubeznik numbers $\lambda_{i,j}$ of a projective scheme are independent of the defining projective embedding …
8
votes
1
answer
390
views
Independence of embedding for higher sheaf cohomology of local cohomology on projective space
Suppose $Y$ is a projective variety over a field $k$. Fix an embedding $\iota: Y \hookrightarrow \mathbb{P}^n_k$ for some $n$, and consider the local cohomology sheaves $\mathcal{H}^j_Y(\omega_{\mathb …