Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with measure-theory
Search options not deleted
user 29697
Questions about abstract measure and Lebesgue integral theory. Also concerns such properties as measurability of maps and sets.
3
votes
Accepted
Does there exist a Penalized Conditional Expectation?
This is a bit different and doesn't address the question, but hopefully close enough to be useful: we know some things about $\mathbb{E} L(Z,Y)$ for other loss functions $L$.
If and only if $L$ is a …
- 4,529
2
votes
Example of a (strictly) proper scoring rule on a general measurable space?
Well, it might be important to limit $\mathcal{P}$ here. If we consider the space $\Omega = \mathbb{R}$ with Lebesgue measure, we might take $\mathcal{P}$ to be the set of distributions with a continu …
- 4,529
3
votes
Example of a (strictly) proper scoring rule on a general measurable space?
Turns out that Gneiting and Raftery give an example in Section 4.2 of the continuous ranked probability score (CRPS), which is strictly proper for $\mathcal{P}$ equal to the Borel probability measures …
- 4,529