Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
This tag is used if a reference is needed in a paper or textbook on a specific result.
54
votes
2
answers
4k
views
Connections between various generalized algebraic geometries (Toen-Vaquié, Durov, Diers, Lur...
As far as I know, there are four possible ways to generalize algebraic geometry by 'simply' replacing the basic category of rings with something similar but more general:
$\bullet$ In the approach by …
43
votes
4
answers
5k
views
Lists as a foundation of mathematics
I am wondering if there is a foundation of mathematics where not sets or "set-like objects" (such as objects of a suitable topos as in ETCS) are the primitive notion, but rather lists. These lists (ak …
34
votes
1
answer
4k
views
Theme of Isbell duality
Let $C$ be a small category. Isbell duality provides an adjunction $\widehat{C} {{\mathcal{O} \atop \longrightarrow} \atop {\longleftarrow \atop \mathrm{Spec}}}\widehat{C^{\mathrm{op}}}^{\mathrm{op}}$ …
27
votes
1
answer
2k
views
A simple proof of the fundamental theorem of Galois theory
Update. It's now on the arXiv.
Some time ago I found my "own" proof of the fundamental theorem of Galois theory. You can find a pdf with the proof (link removed, see arXiv). It is quite short, self-c …
24
votes
1
answer
2k
views
Which functor does the blowing up represent?
Let $X$ be a scheme and $I \subseteq \mathcal{O}_X$ be a quasi-coherent ideal of finite type. The blowing up $\mathrm{Bl}_I(X)$ has the following universal property: It comes with a morphism $p : \mat …
24
votes
3
answers
3k
views
Non-abelian Grothendieck group
By general nonsense the forgetful functor from groups to monoids has a left adjoint. It maps a monoid $(X,\cdot,1)$ to the free group on $\{\underline{x} : x \in X\}$ modulo the relations $\underline{ …
24
votes
1
answer
2k
views
Definition of ind-schemes
What is the correct definition of an ind-scheme?
I ask this because there are (at least) two definitions in the literature, and they really differ.
Definition 1. An ind-scheme is a directed colimit …
17
votes
2
answers
2k
views
Notation for "the" left adjoint functor
As far as I know, there is no "official" notation for the left adjoint of a functor $F : \mathcal{C} \to \mathcal{D}$ if it exists. I have seen the notation $F^*$ sometimes, but this looks only nice w …
16
votes
2
answers
1k
views
The symmetric monoidal category of finite sets
It is well-known that the (augmented) simplex category is the universal monoidal category with a monoid object. What about a commutative analogue? Consider the category $\mathsf{FinSet}$ of finite set …
15
votes
3
answers
743
views
Reference request for Linton's theorems on equational theories
This is a reference request for the following "well-known" theorems in category theory:
There is an equivalence of categories between finitary monads on $\mathbf{Set}$ and finitary Lawvere theories ( …
14
votes
2
answers
755
views
Is there a large colimit-sketch for topological spaces?
Question. Is there a large colimit-sketch $\mathcal{S}$ such that $\mathrm{Mod}(\mathcal{S}) \simeq \mathbf{Top}$?
In other words, is there a category $\mathcal{E}$ with a class of cocones $\mathcal{S …
13
votes
3
answers
1k
views
Adding inverses to a symmetric monoidal category (Reference?)
As we all know, the forgetful functor $\mathsf{Ab} \to \mathsf{CMon}$ from abelian groups to commutative monoids has a left adjoint, the Grothendieck group. I would like to categorify this constructio …
13
votes
3
answers
666
views
IBN for algebraic theories
Let us say that a finitary algebraic theory $\tau$ has IBN (invariant basis number) if the free functor $F : \mathsf{Set} \to \mathsf{Mod}(\tau)$ reflects the isomorphism relation: If $S,T$ are sets w …
13
votes
0
answers
792
views
Reference request for a complete and formal Duality Principle in category theory
Most textbooks on category theory only sketch the meaning of the Duality Principle. But even when they do it more formally, I have only seen a version so far which concerns the language of a (single) …
12
votes
4
answers
1k
views
Kan extensions in the $2$-category of monoidal categories
Kan extensions make sense in any $2$-category. But so far I have only really seen them in the case of the $2$-category of categories, functors, natural transformations and the $2$-category of $k$-line …