Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options questions only not deleted user 2841

This tag is used if a reference is needed in a paper or textbook on a specific result.

2 votes
1 answer
259 views

Criterion for open morphisms without constructible sets?

The following theorem is proved in EGA IV 2.4.6: Every morphism of schemes, which is flat and locally of finite presentation, is open. I've already seen some applications of this theorem, so I want …
Martin Brandenburg's user avatar
5 votes
4 answers
664 views

Indization as adjoint from finite colimits to all colimits

Where can I find a reference for the following fact: If $C$ is a small category with finite colimits, then $\text{Ind}(C)$ is a category with all colimits, and it is the universal one in the followin …
Martin Brandenburg's user avatar
6 votes
0 answers
325 views

Categories with two objects, or mixed bimodules

A category with just one object is a monoid. A category with two objects (which are distinguished) can be described by the following data (imagine the picture $\stackrel{M}{\curvearrowright} \bullet …
Martin Brandenburg's user avatar
9 votes
2 answers
894 views

"Étalification" of a scheme

Let $X$ be a scheme. Does the forgetful functor $$\mathrm{EtSch}/X \to \mathrm{Sch}/X$$ have a right adjoint $Z \mapsto \tilde{Z}$? One might call $\tilde{Z}$ the étalification of $Z$. So this is an …
Martin Brandenburg's user avatar
8 votes
2 answers
331 views

Strongly compact categories (reference request)

The notion of a "compact category" was introduced by Isbell$\color{red}{^{1,2}}$. A locally small category $\mathcal{C}$ is called compact when every functor $\mathcal{C} \to \mathcal{D}$ into any cat …
Martin Brandenburg's user avatar
4 votes
0 answers
227 views

Quasi-coherent module of (global) finite presentation

If $\mathscr{X}$ is a stack over some base ring $k$ (if you are not familiar with stacks, read "schemes" here), we may consider it as a pseudofunctor $\mathscr{X} : \mathsf{CAlg}(k) \to \mathsf{Gpd}$ …
Martin Brandenburg's user avatar
7 votes
1 answer
281 views

Monoidal transformations are isomorphisms at dualizable objects

Here is a cute observation: Let $F,G : \mathcal{C} \to \mathcal{D}$ be a symmetric monoidal functors between symmetric monoidal categories, and let $\eta : F \to G$ be a monoidal transformation. Then …
Martin Brandenburg's user avatar
6 votes
3 answers
573 views

profinite spaces coming from profinite groups

This is probably well-known: Does every nonempty profinite space occur as the underlying space of a profinite group? If not, which conditions have to be imposed? - Is every profinite group isomorphi …
Martin Brandenburg's user avatar
4 votes
1 answer
551 views

Factorization of schemes

Let $k$ be a ring (perhaps a field). Let $M$ be the "set" of isomorphism classes of $k$-algebras and regard it as a commutative monoid with multiplication $\otimes_k $ and unit element $k$. There is a …
Martin Brandenburg's user avatar
5 votes
0 answers
271 views

Cocontinuous monadic functors

Some forgetful functors of algebraic categories preserve colimits, but most do not. In order to understand this phenomen in general, I have classified cocontinuous monadic functors whose target is an …
Martin Brandenburg's user avatar
7 votes
0 answers
356 views

Free modules generate all quasi-coherent modules

The following statement is true* and not hard to prove. Let $X$ be a quasi-compact and separated scheme. Then every quasi-coherent $\mathcal{O}_X$-module is a subquotient of a free $\mathcal{O}_X …
Martin Brandenburg's user avatar
10 votes
2 answers
522 views

Kan extensions inside a monoidal category

Every monoidal category $(\mathcal{C},\otimes)$ can be seen as a one-object bicategory: the morphisms are the objects of $\mathcal{C}$, and the $2$-morphisms are the morphisms of $\mathcal{C}$. In eve …
Martin Brandenburg's user avatar
6 votes
2 answers
912 views

Explicit description of the stack associated to a groupoid

Let $\{X_1 \rightrightarrows X_0\}$ be a smooth groupoid object in the category of affine schemes ($X_0 \to X_1$, $X_1 \to X_1$ and $X_1 \times_{X_0} X_1 \to X_1$ also belong to the datum). Equivalent …
Martin Brandenburg's user avatar
24 votes
1 answer
2k views

Which functor does the blowing up represent?

Let $X$ be a scheme and $I \subseteq \mathcal{O}_X$ be a quasi-coherent ideal of finite type. The blowing up $\mathrm{Bl}_I(X)$ has the following universal property: It comes with a morphism $p : \mat …
Martin Brandenburg's user avatar
6 votes
1 answer
473 views

Universal property of module categories over monads

Let $T$ be a monad on a cocomplete category $\mathcal{C}$. Let's assume that $T$ preserves reflexive coequalizers (or something weaker?). Then the category of $T$-modules $\mathsf{Mod}(T)$ is cocomple …
Martin Brandenburg's user avatar

15 30 50 per page