Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with descent
Search options answers only
not deleted
user 26735
19
votes
Accepted
Cohomology of sheaves in different Grothendieck topologies
As you pointed out, your question (for general sheaves of abelian groups)
follows from the vanishing of the derived functors $R^if_*{\mathcal F}$ for $i>0$,
and that's all one can say.
A good exampl …
- 1,553