Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options not deleted user 2653

Commutative rings, modules, ideals, homological algebra, computational aspects, invariant theory, connections to algebraic geometry and combinatorics.

14 votes
Accepted

An example where GCD depends on the domain

(Edit: first version was about lcm rather than gcd). Take $R=k[u,v,w]$, $a=uv$, $b=vw$. Then $gcd_R(a,b)=v$ (times constant). Now let $S=k[a,b]$. Since $a$ and $b$ are independent, $gcd_S(a,b)=1$ (tim …
t3suji's user avatar
  • 4,540
10 votes
Accepted

When does a quasicoherent sheaf vanish?

If the scheme is locally noetherian, this is true and can be proved by noetherian induction. In fact, you can even replace $M$ with an object of bounded derived quasi-coherent category, if you are int …
t3suji's user avatar
  • 4,540
3 votes
Accepted

'Strong' density of differential operators in linear operators

I think it may be easier if you do not choose the open cover in advance, so that the cover may depend on $M$. Equivalently, let us work with local rings first. Here is a sketch of the argument. I am …
t3suji's user avatar
  • 4,540
14 votes
Accepted

Derivations of C(X)? or Why Must Supermanifolds be Smooth?

Here's a proof from definition. (I don't think it has anything to do with compactness.) Let us show that derivation $\delta:C(X)\to C(X)$ vanishes for any topological manifold $X$. Indeed, $\delta(1) …
t3suji's user avatar
  • 4,540