Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with noncommutative-algebra
Search options not deleted
user 2503
Non-commutative rings and algebras, non-associative algebras. Can be used in combination with ra.rings-and-algebras
22
votes
Accepted
Why is "naive" definition of non-commutative spectrum bad?
I have also wondered about this question and recently came across some papers that seem to answer it.
First of all, the paper
Manuel L. Reyes, Obstructing extensions of the functor Spec to noncommu …
- 5,901