Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with finite-groups
Search options not deleted
user 246663
Questions on group theory which concern finite groups.
28
votes
6
answers
1k
views
Are there always more conjugacy classes in the kernel of a morphism to $Z_2$ than not?
Let $G$ be a finite group and let $\phi:G\to Z_2$ be a homomorphism to the group with two elements. Is it always the case that there are more conjugacy classes in the kernel of $\phi$ than conjugacy c …
- 513
13
votes
Are there always more conjugacy classes in the kernel of a morphism to $Z_2$ than not?
I have a solution to the case of a general cyclic quotient which follows @diracdeltafunk's answer on MSE.
If $A=Z_n$ is cyclic then we can treat $\phi:G\to Z_n\hookrightarrow\mathbb{C}$ as a one dime …
- 513