Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with nonstandard-analysis
Search options questions only
not deleted
user 24611
Nonstandard analysis is a way of doing calculus and analysis with infinitesimals. The historical approach of Leibniz, Euler, and others to infinitesimal calculus was gradually replaced by epsilon, delta techniques in the context of a real continuum, in the 19th century. It was not until the 1960s that Abraham Robinson developed a theory of a hyperreal continuum that allows for a development of analysis procedurally akin to that of its founders.
11
votes
4
answers
1k
views
Surreal numbers, ultrapowers of $\Bbb R$, ordinal-valued functions and the slow-growing hier...
Philip Ehrlich's paper “The Absolute Arithmetic Continuum and the Unification of All Numbers Great and Small”, The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 18 (1) 2012, pp. 1-45. claims as a theorem that, in NBG, $ …
- 10.1k
9
votes
1
answer
307
views
Transfinitely iterating the Levi-Civita, Hahn or Puiseux constructions
This question was originally asked at MSE but seems too advanced, so I'm reposting it here.
In short, the idea is that many constructions for non-Archimedean fields can naturally be iterated, in some …
- 2,519
16
votes
3
answers
2k
views
Interpreting Conway's remark about using the surreals for non-standard analysis
In Conway's "On Numbers And Games," page 44, he writes:
NON-STANDARD ANALYSIS
We can of course use the Field of all numbers, or rather various small
subfields of it, as a vehicle for the techniques o …
- 6,453
6
votes
2
answers
511
views
"Lebesgue-measurable" cardinals and real-closed fields
I understand the motivation behind measurable cardinals is to ask the question: "is there any set large enough to admit a non-trivial measure on all of its subsets?"
Hence, it's also worthwhile to as …
- 2,281
9
votes
1
answer
525
views
Pontryagin dual of the surreal numbers?
Has any work been done on the Pontryagin dual of the surreal numbers (suitably topologized)? I have not been able to find anything and am not sure if this is still unknown.
Alternatively, has this be …
- 31.2k