Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
Spectrum, resolvent, numerical range, functional calculus, operator semigroups. Special classes of operators: compact, Fredholm, dissipative, differential, integral, pseudodifferential, etc.
2
votes
0
answers
117
views
How much Gleason type theorem do I need? Quasi states vs. states
Let $\varphi$ be a quasi state on $B(H)$. What does it mean? It means that $\varphi(cA)=c\varphi(A)$ for $c \in \mathbb{C}, A \in B(H)$, $\varphi(A) \geq 0$ for positive $A$ and $\varphi(A+B)=\varphi( …
5
votes
0
answers
297
views
Wightman reconstruction theorem-details of the proof
First of all forgive me if this question is not well suited for this forum: it is motivated by physics however after all my concerns are mathematical so I hope it would be appropriate to post it here. …
1
vote
0
answers
343
views
Canonical commutation relations-bounded vs. unbounded picture
Suppose that $Q,P$ are self-adjoint operators which satisfy the relation $$(1) \ \ \ \ \ [Q,P]=iI$$ One can easily show that in this case $P,Q$ cannot be bounded. However one can find unbounded operat …
3
votes
0
answers
39
views
Second order signature operator in diffeomorphism invariant geometry as an image under right...
I would like to understand the following statement taken from this paper, dealing with the so called Transverse Index Theory or in other words with the index theory for diffeomorphism invariant geomet …
3
votes
0
answers
199
views
Type III von Neumann algebra generated by one operator
Is it possible to explicitly construct the Hilbert space $H$ and operator $T \in B(H)$ such that the von Neumann it generates is type $III$ factor? I would like to see an example.
5
votes
1
answer
199
views
$C(X)$-compact operators and families of compact operators
In this question Operators on Hilbert $C^*$-module and families of Fredholm operators I asked about the relation between being a family of compact operators $F:X \to K(H)$ on Hilbert space $H=\ell^2$ …
3
votes
1
answer
245
views
Operators on Hilbert $C^*$-module and families of Fredholm operators
If $A$ is a $C^*$-algebra, there is a notion of Hilbert $A$-module (which is something like Hilbert space but the inner product takes values in $A$). The standard example is $H_A:=\{(a_n)_{n=1}^{\inft …
16
votes
1
answer
1k
views
Hodge de Rham operator and orientability
Let $(M,g)$ be a Riemannian manifold. One can consider the exterior algebra bundle $\Lambda(T^*M)$. The sections of this bundle are differential forms, to be noted by $\Omega^k(M)$. One can consider d …
1
vote
0
answers
151
views
Norm of the operator acting on spinor bundle
Please forgive me if the question is too elementary, but however I was unable to manage by myself. The question comes from J.Varilly, H.Figueroa and J. Gracia-Bondia book "Elements of noncommutative g …