Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with martingales
Search options not deleted
user 23648
1
vote
1
answer
77
views
Non-relativized, Computable and Schnor randomness w.r.t a measure
Does this claim generalize to computable (computable martingales) or Schnor (tests with uniformly computable measures) even in the presence of atoms? … I tagged this with martingales as that is how one defines computable randomness but I'm not sure if the tag should be used (even if technically accurate) to the notion as used in algorithmic randomness …
- 3,029