Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options answers only not deleted user 23141
18 votes
Accepted

Perturbation of unbounded self-adjoint operators

I'm not familiar with Putnam's book, but part (2) of this theorem should be available in any of the standard references, e.g., Conway's Course in Functional Analysis or Reed and Simon, Functional Anal …
Nik Weaver's user avatar
  • 42.8k
3 votes
Accepted

Special form of unbounded operators on $L_2(\mathbb{R}_+, \mathcal{H})$

Basically you're asking for the map to take almost every fiber into itself. For bounded operators this is equivalent to commuting with every operator of the form $M_g$ with $g \in L^\infty({\bf R}_+) …
Nik Weaver's user avatar
  • 42.8k
19 votes

On commutator of bounded operators

If $H$ is finite dimensional there is a one-line solution: ${\rm tr}(JK - KJ) = 0$, so $JK - KJ$ cannot have positive spectrum. But it is false in general! Let $V$ be a partial isometry from $H$ onto …
Nik Weaver's user avatar
  • 42.8k
11 votes

Unbounded operators vs compact operators

Well, if $A$ is bounded and $B$ is compact then $AB$ is compact, so $AB$ cannot be the identity unless the Banach space is finite dimensional. Thus the left (or right) inverse of a compact operator on …
Nik Weaver's user avatar
  • 42.8k
1 vote

An inverse to functional calculus

I think you want functions from $\mathbb{R}$ to $\mathbb{R}$, not to $\mathbb{R} \cup \{\infty\}$. Because if $f$ takes the value $\infty$ at $\lambda$ then $f(A)$ won't be self adjoint --- unless $\l …
Nik Weaver's user avatar
  • 42.8k
10 votes

C*-algebraic representation of observables vs self-adjoint operators one

I think the best way to answer this question is to direct you to an introductory textbook on the mathematics of quantum mechanics. One book I really like is Hilbert Space Operators in Quantum Physics …
Nik Weaver's user avatar
  • 42.8k
4 votes
Accepted

Commuting with self-adjoint operator

Any bounded Borel function $f: \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}$. If $TS = ST$ then (taking adjoint of both sides) $S^*T = TS^*$. Therefore both ${\rm Re}(S) = \frac{1}{2}(S + S^*)$ and ${\rm Im}(S) = \frac{ …
Nik Weaver's user avatar
  • 42.8k
4 votes
Accepted

Spectrum equals eigenvalues for unbounded operator

I agree with Andreas that the obvious straightforward interpretation of "the eigenvalues grow to infinity" is that the sequence of eigenvalues $(\lambda_n)$ increases to infinity. (And, counter to Sas …
Nik Weaver's user avatar
  • 42.8k