Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with noncommutative-algebra
Search options questions only
not deleted
user 22810
Non-commutative rings and algebras, non-associative algebras. Can be used in combination with ra.rings-and-algebras
9
votes
0
answers
260
views
About an algebraic construction of a sheaf of formal microdifferential operators
While reading these notes by Victor Ginzburg on $D$-modules I found a certain construction of Microlocailzation in the algebraic setting which unfortunately doesn't seem to be elaborated on a lot in t …
CommunityBot
- 1
5
votes
0
answers
264
views
Do almost commutative flat degenerations induce equality in K-theory? (Or: Is the characteri...
I intentionally phrased the title to match a different question which is almost identical to the one i'm asking. However similar, the answer there, which uses commutative algebraic geometry, is not di …
- 7,789
15
votes
4
answers
3k
views
Why should the tensor product of $\mathcal{D}_X$-modules over $\mathcal{O}_X$ be a $\mathcal...
Let $R$ be a regular algebra over a field $k$ of char 0. Let $D$ be its corresponding algebra of differential operators.
As in the general setting of non-commutative algebra we can tensor right $D$- …
- 7,789