Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with stable-homotopy-category
Search options not deleted
user 22131
8
votes
Accepted
Inverting objects in a symmetric monoidal category
To be clear, this claim refers to a very specific construction of $\mathcal{C}[X^{-1}]$, where you copy the construction of the localization of the ring and defines it as the colimits of:
$$ \mathcal{ …
- 42.4k
18
votes
Why the sphere spectrum is more correct than $\mathbb{Z}$?
For this to work, it is best to identify connective spectrum with spaces equipped with a group-like $E_\infty$-algebra structure (these are equivalent).
From this point of view:
$\mathbb{Z}$ is the f …
- 42.4k