Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
3
votes
Accepted
Grothendieck topologies on $\mathbb{C}$
There is (as always) a finer topology $T$ making this into a sheaf, the question is whether this topology is different from the usual one or not.
The cover for $T$ of an open subset $V \subset \mathb …
9
votes
Needless axiom for Grothendieck topologies?
The only important axiom in order to define a notion of sheaf is the stability under pullback. There is a proposition in SGA4 saying that if you have a family of sieves only satisfying the pullback st …
5
votes
Accepted
When can a scheme be recovered from its descent groupoid?
In any topos, if $Y \rightarrow X$ is an epimorphism then:
$$Y \times_X Y \rightrightarrows Y \rightarrow X $$
is indeed a colimit diagram.
If you have a site $S$ and a cover $Y \rightarrow X$ the …
5
votes
Accepted
Exercise on "locality" in topos theory
Let $ \chi : X \rightarrow \Omega$ be the characteristic function of $U$.
By definition of a subobject classifier, the characteristic function of the pullback of $U$ by $U_i \rightarrow X$ is just th …
2
votes
Accepted
Are the injections of a coproduct a cover in the canonical pretopology?
This will not be the case in general. A family is a cover in the canonical topology if all its pullbacks are jointly regular epimorphism.
So this will for example be the case if coproducts are univers …
9
votes
Accepted
Relationship between canonical topology on a topos and its site of definition
This is essentially correct, and there is no need for the topology to be subcanonical. But let me clarify:
Whether the topology is subcaninical or not, we have the following: given any family of maps …