Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options answers only not deleted user 22131
3 votes
Accepted

Grothendieck topologies on $\mathbb{C}$

There is (as always) a finer topology $T$ making this into a sheaf, the question is whether this topology is different from the usual one or not. The cover for $T$ of an open subset $V \subset \mathb …
Simon Henry's user avatar
  • 42.4k
9 votes

Needless axiom for Grothendieck topologies?

The only important axiom in order to define a notion of sheaf is the stability under pullback. There is a proposition in SGA4 saying that if you have a family of sieves only satisfying the pullback st …
Simon Henry's user avatar
  • 42.4k
5 votes
Accepted

When can a scheme be recovered from its descent groupoid?

In any topos, if $Y \rightarrow X$ is an epimorphism then: $$Y \times_X Y \rightrightarrows Y \rightarrow X $$ is indeed a colimit diagram. If you have a site $S$ and a cover $Y \rightarrow X$ the …
Simon Henry's user avatar
  • 42.4k
5 votes
Accepted

Exercise on "locality" in topos theory

Let $ \chi : X \rightarrow \Omega$ be the characteristic function of $U$. By definition of a subobject classifier, the characteristic function of the pullback of $U$ by $U_i \rightarrow X$ is just th …
Simon Henry's user avatar
  • 42.4k
2 votes
Accepted

Are the injections of a coproduct a cover in the canonical pretopology?

This will not be the case in general. A family is a cover in the canonical topology if all its pullbacks are jointly regular epimorphism. So this will for example be the case if coproducts are univers …
Simon Henry's user avatar
  • 42.4k
9 votes
Accepted

Relationship between canonical topology on a topos and its site of definition

This is essentially correct, and there is no need for the topology to be subcanonical. But let me clarify: Whether the topology is subcaninical or not, we have the following: given any family of maps …
Simon Henry's user avatar
  • 42.4k