Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with computability-theory
Search options not deleted
user 2185
computable sets and functions, Turing degrees, c.e. degrees, models of computability, primitive recursion, oracle computation, models of computability, decision problems, undecidability, Turing jump, halting problem, notions of computable randomness, computable model theory, computable equivalence relation theory, arithmetic and hyperarithmetic hierarchy, infinitary computability, $\alpha$-recursion, complexity theory.
5
votes
1
answer
366
views
Why restrict to $\Sigma_1^0$ formulas in $RCA_0$ induction?
I recently asked this question over on math.se, warmly welcomed by crickets. I hope it's appropriate here.
I'm reading Stillwell's Reverse Mathematics, and the induction axiom was just introduced.
…
- 595
12
votes
2
answers
1k
views
Why can Diophantine equations represent exponential growth?
The wikipedia page on Matiyasevich's theorem challenges:
Unfortunately there seems to be as yet no short intuitive explanation as to why Diophantine equations can represent exponential growth only …
- 595