Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with gr.group-theory
Search options not deleted
user 21291
Questions about the branch of algebra that deals with groups.
7
votes
Accepted
References request: reflections in coxeter groups
As you find in "Humphreys, Reflection and Coxeter groups" (link behind paywall) in Section 5.7, the set of reflections of a Coxeter system $(W,S)$ is given by $R = \{ wsw^{-1} : w \in W, s \in S\}$, t …
- 3,271
3
votes
Accepted
Do we have a one to one correspondence between positive roots and reflections in a Coxeter g...
I suggest, you really look carefully into the reference "Humphreys, Reflection and Coxeter groups" (link behind paywall), as you again find the answer there.
Please look into the reference for details …
- 3,271
6
votes
Accepted
Elements of Coxeter group whose simple reflections pairwise commute
If I see it correctly, there is not much going on in the set $X(G)$ from the viewpoint of Coxeter systems: Let $S$ be the simple system and let $G$ be the Coxeter graph of $(W,S)$ with vertex set $S$. …
- 3,271
4
votes
Uniform proof that a finite (irreducible real) reflection group is determined by its degrees?
As it is not clearly stated here so far: As far as I know there is still no conceptual explanation of this observation.
We were looking at this situation for unitary reflection groups in Proposition 2 …
- 3,271
6
votes
A decomposition of $w_0$ which is similar to the reduced decomposition
Consider the (strong) Bruhat order on the symmetric group: This order is defined for $a,b \in \mathcal{S}_n$ as $a \leq b$ if $\ell(a) < \ell(b)$ and $at=b$ for a transposition $t$.
Therefore, your f …
- 3,271