Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with chevalley-groups
Search options not deleted
user 21252
The Chevalley group is a way, uniform over all fields (and commutative rings), to define a split simple algebraic group of a given type.
7
votes
0
answers
2k
views
What meanings does "Chevalley group" have?
It appears to me that there are at least two working definitions of the term "Chevalley group" operative in the literature. For example, one can consider Steinberg's notes on the subject. Starting fro …
- 590
1
vote
0
answers
270
views
(When) can the presentation in Steinberg's Yale notes fail to give an algebraic group?
I'm trying to understand a remark which appears on p. 1483 of Cohen, Murray and Taylor's "Computing in Groups of Lie Type." It says, "We have not used the presentations described in [7] or [30] becaus …
- 590