Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options not deleted user 1946

first-order and higher-order logic, model theory, set theory, proof theory, computability theory, formal languages, definability, interplay of syntax and semantics, constructive logic, intuitionism, philosophical logic, modal logic, completeness, Gödel incompleteness, decidability, undecidability, theories of truth, truth revision, consistency.

2 votes
Accepted

Is anyone talking about partial interpretations of theories? (Edited)

One common example where this arises is in the consideration of $\omega$-models of set theory. These are precisely the models that interpret their natural numbers as the standard natural numbers $\ome …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
2 votes

complexity of proof of p(n) grows greater with n if for all x P(x) is unprovable?

Consider the assertion $P(x)$ that asserts "$x$ is not the Gödel code of a proof of a contradiction in PA". If PA is consistent, then we can prove $P(n)$ for any particular natural number $n$, since …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
7 votes
Accepted

Is $PA+ \neg R_{PA}$ $\Pi_1$- conservative over $PA$?

The Rosser sentence $R$ asserts, "for every proof of $R$ in PA, there is a smaller proof of $\neg R$." So $\neg R$ asserts, "there is a proof of $R$ in PA, with no smaller proof of $\neg R$." In part …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
3 votes
Accepted

Completeness of a set of propositional formulas

Given a finite propositional theory, one can decide completeness by checking the truth table. As Emil mentions, in general completeness for a finite theory will be NP-complete. But your examples are …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
7 votes
Accepted

Can a class of arithmetical statements containing its own soundness condition be closed unde...

The answer to both questions is negative. Theorem. There is no class $C$ of formulas in the language of arithmetic, such that the assertion "$T$ is not $C$-sound" is uniformly expressible in $C$ for …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
4 votes

Statement of consistency in Godel's second incompleteness theorem

First, notice that one can have a somewhat cheating solution, like this: You didn't say what $A$ was, but let me assume that it is consistent. There are two cases. If $\Sigma$ happens to be consistent …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
3 votes
Accepted

A question about relativized admissibility theory

Let me assume first that by $\omega_1$ you meant $\omega_1^L$, that is, the $\omega_1$ of $L$. In this case, no, even the $1$-special reals are not bounded. To see this, note first that there are unb …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
1 vote

Existential-universal quadratic arithmetic

I understand your decision problem as follows: we are given finitely many real constants and a formula $F$ that is a disjunction of linear inequalities in the form you mention, having real variables $ …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
23 votes

Unprovable statements S where the only way to prove S is to assume S

Theorem. There are no minimally unprovable statements, over any computably axiomatizable theory $T$ interpreting basic arithmetic. Proof. Suppose that $S$ is not provable in $T$, that $T+S$ is consis …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
8 votes

When is $\mathbb{L}$-rank definable in inner models of $\mathbb{V} = \mathbb{L}$?

This is a great question, and very subtle. Here is a way to see that the relation cannot be uniformly definable. Suppose $L_\alpha$ is a countable model of ZFC, and $\phi$ works as you say in every m …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
4 votes
Accepted

Is the structure $(\omega,+,2^n)$ undecidable?

As Marty explained in this answer, this question is the central topic of the paper On the expansion $\langle \mathbb{N},+,2^x\rangle$ of Presburger arithmetic, by Françoise Point, based on a joint pro …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
1 vote

If M is an inner model containing all the reals, might every game in M be determined in V?

Two observations. First, I note that your hypothesis implies projective determinacy, since $M$ and $V$ have exactly the same projective sets, and if they have winning strategies in $V$ then those str …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
1 vote

Closure of one relation w.r.t other

(This is more of a comment than an answer, but too long for the comment box.) Your property is saying precisely that $[(R\circ R')\upharpoonright\text{dom}(R)]\subseteq R$. I'm not sure I like your …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
10 votes

Provability of termination. Whats wrong with my reasoning?

What you have (re)discovered is a proof of Goedel's first incompleteness theorem via the halting problem. Let us suppose that we have already established that the halting problem is undecidable, which …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
2 votes
Accepted

Bounded-variable logic: "fewer than $\alpha$ variables" equivalent to "every subformula has ...

If you are speaking of infinitary logic, which your notation (and your other question) suggests, then the statement is not true. Take the case $\alpha=\omega$. Suppose that $\varphi_n$ is a sentence t …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar

1
2 3 4 5
33
15 30 50 per page