Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options not deleted user 184

Enriched categories, topoi, abelian categories, monoidal categories, homological algebra.

14 votes

Is there only one natural transformation from the product functor to itself?

No, this is not the case. Let the category C be vector spaces (say over the real numbers). Given any real number we get a natural transformation of the identity functor on C. On components for a giv …
Chris Schommer-Pries's user avatar
1 vote

Groups lying horizontally in 2-groups

I have not checked that your construction in invariant under (2-)equivalence of (coherent) 2-group. If it is not invariant, then your question is ill-posed. Assuming your question is well-posed and …
Chris Schommer-Pries's user avatar
7 votes
3 answers
822 views

internal homs and adjunctions?

This is probably an easy question. Let C be a category with (finite) products. An internal hom in C category is an object uhom(X, Z) which represents the functor: Y |-----> hom(Y x X, Z) here "u …
Chris Schommer-Pries's user avatar
7 votes
Accepted

Explicit construction of the quotient of a category by a group action

This question has been bugging me since it was posted, in part because I keep thinking you should have a homotopy action and should take the homotopy quotient. But anyway.... whew! I have an example …
Chris Schommer-Pries's user avatar
11 votes

Which categories are injective with respect to fully faithful functors?

I will focus on the strictly injective case. Claim: The only strictly injective categories are the posets which are complete lattices. The strict injective property requires that you have the lifting …
Chris Schommer-Pries's user avatar
3 votes

Why aren't all small categories accessible?

This isn't really a fulll answer, but there is a obvious guess for (2). Consider those categories for which there exists a cardinal $\kappa$ and a set of $\kappa$-compact objects such that every objec …
Chris Schommer-Pries's user avatar
19 votes

What is the motivation for maps of adjunctions?

Here is an example of how one might have stumbled upon the definition of a map of adjunctions. Suppose that you are working on a research project with a collaborator. Let's call her Jane for the sake …
Chris Schommer-Pries's user avatar
5 votes

An orthogonal factorization system on 1-Cob?

[Note: This answer pertains to the orignal version of the question, and no longer applies given the subsequent edits]. To be a weak factorization system you need to factor morphisms as composites $ …
Chris Schommer-Pries's user avatar
3 votes

weak version of a Baez-Crans 2-vector space?

Let T be the algebraic theory of vector spaces (in the sense of Lawvere). Then a T-algebra in the category of small categories is a Baez-Crans 2-vector space. You seem to be asking about pseudo-T-alge …
Chris Schommer-Pries's user avatar
2 votes
Accepted

$\Omega$ and $B$ as adjoints between symmetric monoidal $(\infty,n)$- and $(\infty,n-1)$-cat...

I assume you meant "symmetric monoidal functors". Yes, this seems to hold. By your description you have constructed maps: $$ \eta: \mathcal{C} \cong \Omega B \mathcal{C}$$ $$ \varepsilon: B \Omega \ …
Chris Schommer-Pries's user avatar
4 votes
Accepted

How strict can I be in the definition of "2-group"?

You can always do this. Take any $b$ and define $d = p_2 b$. Then $b' = (p_1, d)$ is equivalent to the original $b$. To see this note that $$(p_1, m) \circ b = (p_1b, m \circ (p_1 b, d)) \simeq id = …
Chris Schommer-Pries's user avatar
7 votes

Classifying spaces for enriched categories

For a category enriched in topological spaces, the usual classifying space can be made to take into account the topology on morphisms. More generally this works for categories internal to top and is d …
Chris Schommer-Pries's user avatar
3 votes
Accepted

Is there a sensible way to enrich over SymMonCat such that id_X is not the monoidal unit?

[Ignore this first part, I'm just leaving it for the context to the comments below.] It is hard for me to understand why you would want to enrich in symmetric monoidal categories, have an identity, a …
Chris Schommer-Pries's user avatar
18 votes

Is the category of commutative group schemes abelian?

This is not true. It fails for essentially the same reason that the category of topological commutative groups fail to be an abelian category. For simplicity let's work over an algebraically closed …
Chris Schommer-Pries's user avatar
19 votes
3 answers
605 views

Characterizing Groupoids via Quotients?

A groupoid is a category in which all morphisms are invertible.(*) The groupoids form a very nice subclass of categories. The inclusion of the groupoids into the 2-category of small categories admits …
Chris Schommer-Pries's user avatar

1
2 3 4 5
15 30 50 per page