Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with topological-quantum-field-theory
Search options answers only
not deleted
user 18060
Topological quantum field theory.
10
votes
Accepted
Do Frobenius subalgebras form a lattice?
No. Let $A$ be the cohomology algebra of a Riemann surface of genus $g \geq 3$, i.e. it has a basis of the form $1, x_1,\dots, x_{2g}, z$ with $1$ the unit, $x_i z=0=zx_i $ for all $i$, $$x_i x_j = \b …
14
votes
Accepted
Relationship between the TQFTs in Kapustin-Witten and Ben-Zvi-Sakellaridis-Venkatesh
A curve $C$ over $\mathbb F_q$ has dimension $3$ in this perspective (which is why you get a vector space) and a local field has dimension $2$ (which is why you get a category. So one only has to go u …
- 148k