Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
Complex, contact, Riemannian, pseudo-Riemannian and Finsler geometry, relativity, gauge theory, global analysis.
2
votes
1
answer
564
views
Derivative of the Lebesgue integral. Currents.
I consider a special kind of sets in $\mathbb{R}^n_+$ given by $G_t = $ {$x \in \mathbb{R}^n_+ \mid g(x) < t$}, where $\nabla g > 0$ entrywise. Let's consider an integral
$$
f(t) = \int\limits_{ G_ …
3
votes
1
answer
466
views
On the generalized Radon transform and currents
Given a family of hypersurfaces $H_{t,p} = $ {$x \in \mathbb{R}^n \mid g(x,p) = t $} one defines a generalized Radon transform $R$ of a function $u \colon \mathbb{R}^n \to \mathbb{R}$ as
$$
R[u] (t …
20
votes
1
answer
3k
views
Hausdorff measure and the volume form
There are two tools, generalizing a concept of a volume to the case of submanifolds in $\mathbb{R}^n$, namely the Hausdorff measure $H^k$ and the volume form. The question is how to show that if $M$ i …
0
votes
2
answers
432
views
Isomorphism of connections on a complex line bundle
Reading an article I faced with the following theorem, please give me a reference to a proof of the fact which is stated without any reference in the article. Is it a well-known fact?
Theorem. Let $E …
5
votes
1
answer
447
views
Practical way to check whether a distribution is conormal
Let $X$ be a $C^\infty$-manifold, $Y$ be its $C^\infty$-submanifold. Hörmander defines the set $I^m(X,Y)$ of conormal distributions as the set of all $u \in \mathscr D'(X)$ such that
$$
L_1 \ldot …