Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with higher-order-logics
Search options not deleted
user 178292
For logics which admit quantification over sets/relations/functions/etc. rather than merely over individuals. The most common example is second-order logic.
3
votes
Compatibility of Łośian phenomena in second-order logic
I'm not sure I have a definitive answer, but three nice observations that are too long for comments:
If you relax from ultrafilters to extenders (seen as directed systems of ultrafilters), then there …
- 508
3
votes
Accepted
Vopěnka's Principle for non-first-order logics
This is a really late answer, but the answer to your question is "No." As a dual to the Theorem 6 that Thomas Benjamin mentions above (which I believe is a result of Stavi), Janos Makowsky proved tha …
- 508
4
votes
Candidate "AEC-yielding" fragments of bad logics
It's been so long since I've seen a good AEC question on here! In fact, so long I forgot the account info that gives me enough reputation to post this as a comment.
I think this will get you rather c …
- 508