Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with stone-cech-compactification
Search options answers only
not deleted
user 17064
2
votes
Stone-Čech boundary is not extremally disconnected
The question has already been answered satisfactorily, but I think the following presentation, which is implicit in the second part of YCor's answer, will clarify things. The fact that $\beta\mathbb{ …
- 32.5k
8
votes
Is this space the Stone–Čech compactification?
Correction (2022-01-01): In the first version of this answer, I had defined $E$-compact spaces as those $X$ such that the natural evaluation map $X \to E^{C(X,E)}$ is a homeomorphism on a closed subsp …
- 32.5k