Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with rt.representation-theory
Search options not deleted
user 16739
Linear representations of algebras and groups, Lie theory, associative algebras, multilinear algebra.
1
vote
highest weight representation and electromagnetic fields
I think I see the discrepancy. The 6 components of the field then do NOT transform as
a 6 dimensional rep, even for a fixed spacetime point. The action is :
F(x) -> M(g) * F(g' x) (F=field, M : 6x …
- 451