Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with simplicial-stuff
Search options not deleted
user 1631
For questions about simplicial sets, simplicial (co)algebras and simplicial objects in other categories; geometric realization, Dold-Kan correspondence, simplicial resolutions etc.
5
votes
Accepted
What is the precise relationship between "prodsimplicial sets" and rooted trees?
There are a short list of operations described as generating the desired polyhedra:
$ X : \mathrm{Prism} \vdash C X : \mathrm{Prism} $
$ l : \mathrm{list}\ \mathrm{Prism} \vdash \Pi l : \mathrm{ …
- 1,987
0
votes
A canonical and categorical construction for geometric realization
I'd just like to point out that there is a monad on $Top$, (which in the homotopy category looks rather dull,) assigning to each space $X$ its cone $CX$, the mapping cylinder of $X\to * $. The unit m …
CommunityBot
- 1